Otero v. Bridgeport Housing Authority
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the appeal is DISMISSED.
Isabel Otero appeals from an order entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Dorsey, J.), granting defendants’ motion for a new trial. This Court previously reversed the district court’s grant of judgment as a matter of law in favor of the Bridgeport *900Housing Authority and Clarence Craig (collectively “defendants”). Otero v. Bridgeport Hous. Auth., 297 F.3d 142, 151-54 (2d Cir.2002). We remanded for the district court to decide various alternative…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Phillips v. NegleySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Walter W. GRANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAZELETT STRIP-CASTING CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Donald Binder v. Long Island Lighting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Isabel Otero v. Bridgeport Housing Authority, Clarence Craig, Joseph Papa, Jose Colon, Roy Boyd, Anita Wells, Earl MellowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Larsen v. Wright & Cobb Lighterage Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.