Legal Opinion

Larsen v. Wright & Cobb Lighterage Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 30, 1948No. Nos. 177, 178, Dockets 20873, 20874PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

In the action of Larsen v. Wright & Cobb Lighterage Co. judgment was entered in favor of one of the plaintiffs, McCarthy, in January, 1947, which we affirmed on July 21, 1947.1 Other plaintiffs in that action stipulated with the defendant that judgment as to them should await the event of judgment as to McCarthy. In the action of Knudsen v. Lee & Simmons, Inc., there were three plaintiffs and judgment was entered in favor of all three in January, 1947, D.C., 68 F.Supp. 538, which we affirmed on July 21, 1947.2 Both actions were for overtime and liquidated damages under…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Samake v. Thunder Lube, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  3. Sophie Radack and Charles Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc., and Den Norske Amerikalinje, A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Foster-Milburn Co. v. Knight, Chief JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  5. Edward O. Thorp v. John Scarne and Simon & Schuster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API