Legal Opinion
Board of Medical Examiners v. Terminal-Hudson Electronics, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 15, 1977No. Civ. 49970PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON, J.
Terminal-Hudson Electronics, Inc. of California, dba Opti-Cal (hereinafter referred to as Opti-Cal.), has filed an appeal from the judgment of April 27, 1976, in which the superior court in an action filed by the Board of Medical Examiners, State of California, and the Board of Optometiy, State of California (hereinafter referred to collectively as the Board), permanently enjoined and restrained Opti-Cal from advertising the price of eyeglasses or the cost of any commodities
furnished or services performed by a person licensed as a registered dispensing optician.
Facts
On March…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bigelow v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alioto Fish Co., Ltd. v. AliotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- California Arco Distributors, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Sole Energy Co. v. Petrominerals Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. SapseAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
- Wallace v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.