Legal Opinion
Sole Energy Co. v. Petrominerals Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 2005No. G030091PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
Introduction
Defendants Petrominerals Corporation (Petrominerals), Morris V. Hodges, Daniel H. Silverman, Kaymor Petroleum Products (Kaymor), Nevadacor Energy, Inc. (Nevadacor), and Hillcrest Beverly Oil Corporation (HBOC) (collectively defendants) moved for summary judgment on the ground plaintiff Sole Energy Company, a Texas corporation (Sole Energy Corporation), lacked standing to sue. The trial court granted the motion, and judgment was entered.
On the day the order granting summary judgment and the judgment were entered, Sole Energy Corporation filed a motion for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sole Energy Co. v. Petrominerals Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Cassady v. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. v. VirgaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- City of Pasadena v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.