Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. City of Montrose

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 18, 1992No. C3-92-662Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

In an action for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian who tripped and fell on a sidewalk, the district court ruled that the county’s state-aid highway easement did not shift responsibility for maintaining sidewalks from the city to the county. We affirm the summary judgment dismissing the county from the action.

FACTS

In 1957 the state granted Wright County a 66' easement to construct a county state-aid highway over land located within the City of Montrose. The easement includes a 44' roadway and 11' of land on each side of the road. In August 1988 a pedestrian…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Essling v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Knopp v. GuttermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. The Maytag Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Minnesota Power & L. Co. v. Personal Prop. Tax, Etc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Stabs v. City of TowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API