Legal Opinion
Little v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 20, 2002No. Case C-3-01-344PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. # 16); TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs are Charles Sherman Little, Peggy Sue Lowell, and Lyneia Ann Mar-cum (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). Before the Court is their Motion to Remand (Doc. # 16). Defendants are Purdue Pharma, L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., Purdue Frederick Co., Purdue Pharmaceuticals, L.P., Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories, Inc., The P.F. Laboratories, Inc., PRA Holdings, Inc., and Partners Against Pain (collectively, “corporate Defendants”), and CVS 1 and the Medicine Shoppe 2 (collectively,…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Jamison v. Purdue Pharma Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2003
- Virden v. Altria Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2004
- Brown v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2014
- Anderson v. Merck & Co. Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.