Flowers v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
The conviction is for robbery by assault; the punishment, sixty years imprisonment.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.
The appellant first urges that he “was prejudiced by the use of an alleged prior conviction against him at his punishment (hearing) when such alleged prior conviction could not be established by the State.”
As the appellant did not elect to have the jury assess punishment, it was assessed by the court. During the hearing on punishment, the State introduced proof that the appellant had been convicted of felony theft in a prior case in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Dunlap v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tamminen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Tolbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Rodriquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Dylan Andrew Quick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.