Dunlap v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
The conviction is for robbery by assault. A prior conviction was proved for enhancement under the provisions of Art. 62, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. The punishment, life.
The appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Only a brief statement of the evidence will be necessary.
Manuel Gonzales, a student and part-time employee at the West Dallas Drugstore, was tending the cash register at about 8:00 p.m. The appellant and another man came into the store. The other man pointed a pistol at Manuel and said “This is a stick-up.” The appellant was carrying a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Spencer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.