Tamminen v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*800OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
With stinging rebukes to both prosecutor and trial judge in this cause, the San Antonio Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of conviction for aggravated rape, but vacated the sentence of confinement for ninety nine years and remanded the cause to the trial court for assessment of punishment by another district judge. Tamminen v. State, 644 S.W.2d 209 (Tex.App.—San Antonio, 1982). We granted petition for discretionary review presented, respectively, by appellant and the State in order to assay and to evaluate the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Charles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Mason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Abdygapparova v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
- Fryer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Fielding v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.