Legal Opinion

Meyer ex rel. Meyer v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1952No. 38,627PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action to quiet title to real estate. Defendants’ demurrer to plaintiffs’ second amended reply was sustained. Judgment was entered for them on the pleadings. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The action has to do with written instruments identical with those dealt with by us in Eichman v. Landowners Oil Ass’n, 153 *247Kan. 791, 113 P. 2d 1056; Moos v. Landowners Oil Ass’n, 136 Kan. 424, 15 P. 2d 1073; Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. Worcester, 163 Kan. 540, 183 P. 2d 947; Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. Worcester, 167 Kan. 194, 205 P. 2d 942; and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moos v. Landowners Oil Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. WorcesterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Walline v. OlsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Hinderliter v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. WorcesterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. BrookoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Penalosa Cooperative Exchange v. A.S. Polonyi Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API