Legal Opinion

Hinderliter v. Bell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1923No. 24,791PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Mrs. Anna Hinderliter brought this action against the sons and daughter of her deceased husband to cancel and set aside a contract and deed executed by her, but only the daughter, Mrs. Nora E. Bell, and her husband, were served with process. From a decision of the court holding that her petition failed to state a cause of action she appeals.

The averments of her petition, so far as material to the questions raised on this appeal, are in substance that plaintiff was the widow of Daniel W. Hinderliter, who died intestate, leaving a farm in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Foy v. GreenwadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Rogers v. RichardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Duphorne v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Lewis v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cox v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. McFarland v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Converse v. WattsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Keyes v. SteeleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Dorsey v. Protection State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API