Legal Opinion
Dreikausen v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 1, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach dated July 27, 2000, which, after a hearing, granted the application of the respondent Bay Club of Long Beach, Inc., for a use variance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), entered May 17, 2001, which dismissed the proceeding. The appellants’ notice of appeal from an order of the same court dated February 13, 2001, is deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]).
Ordered that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Village Board v. JarroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- SoHo Alliance v. New York City Board of Standards & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- MATTER OF DOUGLASTON CIVIC ASS'N, INC. v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Conte v. Town of Norfolk Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dreikausen v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Matter of DeFeo v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of BedfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Hejna v. Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hejna v. Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of White Plains Rural Cemetery Assn. v. City of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019