Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Bordwell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 26, 1901No. Nos. 12,475 — (59)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Action in the district court for Washington county against Anna Bordwell,' defendant, and Lumberman’s National Bank, garnishee. The garnishee having disclosed a balance due defendant of $335.75, Mary Grant filed a complaint in intervention, in which she claimed to be the owner of the entire sum. Plaintiffs answered and the issues so framed were tried before Williston, J., who directed judgment for intervenor.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Washington county against Anna Bordwell,' defendant, and Lumberman’s National Bank, garnishee. The garnishee having disclosed a balance due defendant of $335.75, Mary Grant filed a complaint in intervention, in which she claimed to be the owner of the entire sum. Plaintiffs answered and the issues so framed were tried before Williston, J., who directed judgment for intervenor. From an order denying a motion for judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiffs appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Plaintiffs recovered judgment against the defendant Anna Bordwell. 'Upon proceedings for garnishment in the district court for *55Washington county, a summons was served on the Lumberman’s National Bank of Stillwater as garnishee, and made returnable before the clerk to secure for plaintiffs the benefit of property belonging to the defendant in the possession of the bank. ’ At the time designated, plaintiffs appeared before the clerk, also the garnishee, by its cashier, who was sworn for the bank, and disclosed that there was in its possession, at the time of the garnishment, $335.75, deposited…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. DraperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
  2. In re Schmidt's EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Fletcher v. FletcherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Edson v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  2. Scott v. Union & Planters' Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Varley v. SimsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. McLeod v. Hennepin County Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Begovich v. KruljacWyoming Supreme Court · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API