City of Bisbee v. Arizona Insurance Agency
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Cochise. Fred Sutter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This is an action of injunction instituted by appellees to restrain the city of Bisbee and its marshal from enforcing the terms of an ordinance of said city requiring fire insurance agents to pay a quarterly license before transacting any business, and prescribing penalties for its violation. The complaint alleges the invalidity of the ordinance, irreparable injury not susceptible of estimation, and a multiplicity of suits. The appellants demurred to the complaint for insufficiency in that it shows upon its face an adequate remedy at law.
As a general rule, the equity side of the court may not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Davis v. American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Wolfe v. . BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- City of Denver v. BeedeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hislop v. RodgersArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Shuman v. GilbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- State Ex Rel. La Prade v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Corbin v. RodgersArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Norcisa v. Board of Selectmen of ProvincetownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.