Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 2009No. 05-CF-1311, 05-CF-1353, 05-CF-1444 & 05-CF-1468PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAMER, Associate Judge:

Appellants Akande L. Johnson and Damon Franklin were both convicted of second-degree murder while armed with a shod foot under a theory of aiding and abetting. On appeal, Johnson argues that the trial court committed reversible error by (1) giving improper jury instructions as to aiding and abetting; (2) permitting the prosecutor to ask improper questions of a witness; (3) excluding some of Johnson’s expert witness’s testimony; (4) refusing to sever the joint trial from that of a third co-defendant (Walter Clark, whose appeal is not before us); (5) admitting certain…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Graure v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Blaine v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Dutch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Van Dyke v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Ronald L. Atkinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API