Johnson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Associate Judge:
Appellants Akande L. Johnson and Damon Franklin were both convicted of second-degree murder while armed with a shod foot under a theory of aiding and abetting. On appeal, Johnson argues that the trial court committed reversible error by (1) giving improper jury instructions as to aiding and abetting; (2) permitting the prosecutor to ask improper questions of a witness; (3) excluding some of Johnson’s expert witness’s testimony; (4) refusing to sever the joint trial from that of a third co-defendant (Walter Clark, whose appeal is not before us); (5) admitting certain…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Graure v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Blaine v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Dutch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Van Dyke v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ronald L. Atkinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.