Legal Opinion

Hexagon Packaging Corp. v. Manny Gutterman & Associates, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 29, 2000No. 96 C 4356PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEINENWEBER, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Before the court are two motions for summary judgment. One has been presented by Manny Gutterman & Associates, Inc., in its own name and doing business as M. Gutterman & Associates, Inc./Jelmar; Jelmar; Jamie Industries, Inc.; and Arthur Gutterman (“Gutterman”), individually (collectively, the “Gutterman defendants”). The second motion was filed by defendant Joseph Ruth (“Ruth”).

The Gutterman defendants and Ruth have adopted each other’s motions. Blidco Incorporated, Betty Day Company, Inc., the Estate of Betty Day, Louis C.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davit v. DavitDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  2. Amari Co. v. BurgessDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Bailey v. DartDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  4. Rutherford v. GladieuxDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API