Amari Co. v. Burgess
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
*650 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge.
Many moons ago, plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging, inter alia, violations of the RICO statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1962. Now before me — several years, multiple amended complaints, and an incredible amount of motion practice later — is defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the only remaining counts in the complaint, which assert violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and (d). For the reasons that follow, their motion is granted in part.
I
To prevail under § 1962(c), plaintiffs must ultimately prove that defendants, being employed by or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harney v. Speedway SuperAmerica, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Barry Richards, Karen Richards, Roland Pepin v. Combined Insurance Company of America and Credit Life Insurance Company of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.