Legal Opinion

Quinius v. Estrada

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1969No. 11705PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

This suit arises out of the same incident involved in Polasek v. Quinius, 438 S.W.2d 828, Tex.Civ.App., Austin, writ ref. n. r. e. (1969). In that case Mary Sue Polasek recovered damages for injuries sustained from Susan Quinius as a proximate result of her negligence. There were three cars involved in the incident, which occurred June 21, 1966, in Austin, Texas, one operated by appellant which she drove south into Northland Drive, an east-west four lane main traffic artery, across the two westbound lanes of Northland and into its near eastbound lane striking the left side of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Rudes v. GottschalkTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Genell, Inc. v. FlynnTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Romankewiz v. BlackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kerby v. Abilene Christian CollegeTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Nabors Well Services, Ltd. v. RomeroTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Carnation Company v. WongTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Jose BARRERA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. King Son Wong v. Carnation CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API