State v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Tama District Court. — Hon. G. W. Burnham, Judge. Indictment charging defendant with the commission of a nuisance. Yerdict of guilty. Judgment on verdict,' and defendant appeals. —
1Opinion of the Court
Weaver, J. —
The defendant is the owner of glucose works at Marshalltown, in Marshall county, Iowa. Certain refuse matter and washings from these works, including more or less of various chemicals used in the production of the goods there manufactured, are discharged into a *526sewer, the flow from which empties directly or indirectly into the Iowa river. From the point of this discharge the-river flows in a south-easterly direction through Tama county. The indictment alleges that the defendant is a. corporation organized under the laws of New Jersey, and that the substance or materials discharged…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mitchell v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Works v. HersheySupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- State v. NewlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- Knox v. RossiNevada Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- State v. HochmuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Lutton v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Farmers Savings Bank v. NeelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Beem v. FarrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.