In re Guardianship of A.S.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Concurrence
Dooley, J.,
¶ 20. concurring. In my view, the probate court had no authority to issue the order it did. The authorization to seal court records to protect confidentiality does not grant a court the power to rewrite history by eliminating any record of an event so that it never occurred. I therefore reject the majority’s premise that this order was a matter of discretion for the probate court. Because I agree, however, that the probate court’s order must be overturned, I concur with the majority’s disposition of this case.
¶ 21. To put this decision in perspective, we need to distinguish two…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Walter F. Kusay, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- In Re Sealed DocumentsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- State v. S.L.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Diana Douglas v. Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.