Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Reed

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1991No. 91-127PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Gary Ferguson appeals from the lower court’s findings that Appellee Ronald Reed substantially complied with the parties’ 1981 agreement and that Ferguson breached their 1988 agreement by failing to make the required payments.

We affirm.

Ferguson raises the following issues:

1. Whether the Trial Court erred in refusing to permit the introduction of extrinsic evidence concerning the meaning of the June 5,1981, Contract between the parties.

2. Whether the Trial Court erred in finding that the Appellee Reed was in substantial compliance with his obligations under the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. DeJulio v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Saunders v. SharpUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Cliff & Co., Ltd. v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Klutznick v. ThulinWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Prudential Preferred Properties v. J and J Ventures, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kirkwood v. Cuna Mutual Ins. SocietyWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Comet Energy Services, LLC v. Powder River Oil & Gas Ventures LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Fremont Homes, Inc. v. ElmerWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Martin v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API