Legal Opinion

Graybill v. Hassel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1950No. Appeal, No. 52PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The defendant entered into a written agreement with plaintiffs, as owners, for the purchase of a tract of land for a total consideration of $13,800. By the sales agreement, the plaintiffs agreed to convey the land “in fee simple with a good and marketable title, clear of all liens and incumbrances, . . . except as hereinafter specially reserved . . .” The agreement described the premises to be conveyed as “All that certain lot or tract of land with a frame House and frame barn thereon erected located in the Townships of Drumore and Mar-tic in Lane. County, Penna. and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kieffer v. ImhoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Merritz v. CircelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Arkansas Improvement Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  4. Western Pennsylvania Railroad v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  5. Nesral Production Co. v. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patricca v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Busin v. WhitingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Owens v. HolzheidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. City of West Fargo v. McAllisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Palmer v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API