Legal Opinion

Nesral Production Co. v. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 3, 1935No. 10362PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

' This much of the brief for the appellee railway company and its trustees is adopted by this court both as to its statement of the issues involved and the determination théreof:

“This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Galveston county denying a temporary injunction to restrain the ap-pellee railway company and its trustees from drilling or permitting the drilling for oil orí land occupied by it in Refugio county. It was alleged that an oil, gas, and mineral lease had been given by ap-pellee railroad to appellee W. M. Howard, and appellant prayed for a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. TruebloodTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Calcasieu Lumber Co. v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bell County v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Olcott v. GabertTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Lindsay v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Texas Electric Railway Co. v. NealeTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. City of Port Isabel v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  3. Sowers v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Ocean Shore Railroad Co. v. DoelgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Texas Conservative Oil Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API