Legal Opinion
Natural Resources Defense Council v. Patterson
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 30, 1992No. Civ. S-88-1658 LKKPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Chief Judge Emeritus.
Plaintiffs, various environmental groups, seek to enjoin the Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”) from entering into renewal contracts to supply water from the Friant Dam unit of the Central Valley Project. 1 They allege violation of the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4332, the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1536, the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, and various federal regulations and guidelines promulgated under those statutes.
On January 7, 1992, plaintiffs were granted leave to amend to assert an APA claim…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1993
- South Yuba River Citizens League v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- San Luis Unit Food Producers v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Karis v. VasquezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.