Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1924No. 8 Div. 220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSampord, J.

After proving the age of the girl and the venue the state proved an act of carnal knowledge fixing the time between August and September, 1922. The details of this act were inquired into with great minuteness. After this proof had been made, the state, over the objections and exceptions of defendant, was permitted to make proof of many subsequent acts of intercourse between defendant and the girl. There are many of these exceptions noted in the record relating to and raising the same question, to wit, after the state has by evidence fixed the time of ¿n offense as charged in the indictment,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dennison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Ex Parte State, in re Brooms v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Herbert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hunt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Owens v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Alldredge v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API