Legal Opinion

Owens v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1939No. 8 Div. 764PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The evidence in this case is in direct conflict. The prosecutrix testifies to a statement of facts which, if believed by the jury beyond a reasonable doubt, makes out a clear case as charged in the indictment. Per contra, the testimony of the defendant if believed by the jury, while corroborating in some particulars the testimony of the prosecutrix, denies pointedly that there was ever any act constituting the offense.

The testimony of other witnesses, both for the.State and the defendant, only tended to corroborate the statement of the one or the other. We have examined the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  2. Hull v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Toulet v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Harris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Oakley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Myers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  4. Durham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1969
  5. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API