Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Smedley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 10, 1982No. 80-3542-NJ-1, CA A24233PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Husband appeals from a decree of dissolution that awarded wife the entire unpaid balance due on the parties’ home, which has been sold. He contends that the trial court erred in that it awarded the balance on the house to wife as an offset against his military retirement pay. We affirm.

The parties were married in 1958. They have four emancipated children. Husband was in the Air Force from 1956 until he retired in 1976; he receives military retirement pay of $771.30 per month net. Wife has worked during the marriage in various positions, mainly with the federal government. She is currently…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Marriage of Karr v. KarrMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Rice v. RiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of WoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. In re the Marriage of WallaceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Matter of Marriage of TibblesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. In re the Marriage of HadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API