Legal Opinion

Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dairyland Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1956PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The learned trial judge filed a memorandum decision in which he determined that the negligence of the deceased Ulrich Grund, was equal to, or exceeded, the negligence of his son, Roland, as a matter of law.

While there is considerable conflict in the testimony, such conflict must be resolved in plaintiff’s favor in considering whether it was error for the trial court to have directed a verdict. This is because a verdict should only be directed against a plaintiff where plaintiff’s evidence, giving it the most favorable construction it will reasonably bear, is insufficient to sustain a verdict…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hansberry v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Scory v. LaFaveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Wuesthoff v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Radmann v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Pelitsie v. National Surety Corp. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davis v. SkilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. White v. LunderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rudzinski v. Warner Theatres, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Burns v. FisherMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Harris v. PlummerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API