Pelitsie v. National Surety Corp. of New York
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCukrie, J.
The policies of burglary insurance upon which suit was brought contain the usual standard exclusion clauses. The exclusion clause material to this appeal read as follows:
“This policy does not apply: . . .
“(d) Unless records are kept by the insured in such manner that the company can accurately determine therefrom the amount of the loss.”
The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial court should have determined as a matter of law that the plaintiff insured failed to substantially comply with said record-keeping clause of the policies. It is the defendants’ contention that the plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Max L. Bloom Co. v. United States Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Radmann v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. King Candy Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Ever Krisp Food Products Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. SkilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Lee v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Co. v. LindseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.