Legal Opinion
United States v. Jack Edgar Burnes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1987No. 86-5119PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOVELL, District Judge:
Following the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence, Jack Edgar Burnes entered a conditional guilty plea, pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2), to one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance. The court fined Burnes $25,000 and sentenced him to six years imprisonment plus a special five year parole term. Burnes appeals his conviction and sentence on the grounds that the district court erred in denying his request for an evidentiary hearing to consider the validity of an affidavit supporting a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Stanley Mills StanertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. James Edward Colkley, United States of America v. Jamison Henry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jerry Alfred WhitworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Robert LOMBARDI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF EL CAJON; Steven Shakowski; Does 1 Through 30, Inclusive, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- United States v. Vince Lee Motz, United States of America v. Joseph Arlen LangerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.