Legal Opinion

Priester v. Cromer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 21, 2012No. 27191PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge

This case returns to us on remand from the United States Supreme Court (USSC) for reconsideration in light of its decision in Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1131, 179 L.Ed.2d 75 (2011). In our previous decision,1 we concluded Appellant’s state-law products liability claims against Ford Motor Company were preempted by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (“FMVSS”) 205. We reaffirm our previous decision.

Appellant filed a products liability claim against Respondent Ford Motor Company premised on the allegation that its 1997 Ford F-150 pick-up truck was defective…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clifton A. Lake v. The Memphis Landsmen, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Lawing v. Trinity Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  4. Eggleston v. United Parcel Service, IncCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API