Legal Opinion
Foster v. Wickliffe
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 2007No. 2006-L-053PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Colleen Mary O’Toole, Judge.
{¶ 1} Martha A. and Gilbert C. Foster appeal the trial court’s judgment entry denying their motion for summary judgment on the constitutionality and validity of City of Wickliffe Ordinance 2000-26 and on related claims. We affirm.
{¶ 2} The instant matter is the latest culmination in a series of disputes between the Fosters and the city of Wickliffe, appellee, relating to the city’s attempt to prohibit parking or storage of recreational vehicles (“RVs”) in the front yards of its residents.
{¶ 3} In December 1986, the city passed Ordinance 1986-58, which amended…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. TackettOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- White v. EmmonsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Blust v. City of Blue AshOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Foster v. WickliffeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Youngstown v. Carrier Servs. Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026