Legal Opinion

Texas Midland Railroad v. Morris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 17, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Kaufman. Tried below before Hon. J. E. Dillard.

1Opinion of the Court

TEMPLETON, Associate Justice.

Morris lost an eye while in the employ of the Midland Railroad and claimed damages on account of the injury. His employer denied liability. The claim was settled by compromise without suit. The release executed by Morris recited a consideration of $25 cash. Pending the compromise Morris became the keeper of appellant’s section house near Terrell. He remained in that position for more than a year, after the settlement was effected, when a controversy arose concerning his method of conducting the business and he retired. He thereupon brought this suit, alleging that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Mesa Agro v. R. C. Dove & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Texas Cent. R. Co. v. EldredgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Foster v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Duff v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API