Legal Opinion

Dilley v. Ketchikan Gateway Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1993No. S-5408PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal arises out of a sales tax dispute between the Ketchikan Gateway Borough (Borough) and Edward Dilley, a licensed pull-tab operator. Dilley was assessed over $400,000 for uncollected sales taxes, and interest, on gross revenues from pull-tab sales. The Borough Assembly denied Dilley’s appeal and upheld the assessment. The superior court affirmed. We reverse.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Dilley operates pull-tab games 1 under a state license. Typically, non-profit organizations retain Dilley to operate a pull-tab game for fund-raising purposes. See AS…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Public Employees' Local 71 v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. United States v. MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  3. Hillstrom v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Chilivis v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Navistar International Transportation Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kotzebue Lions Club v. City of KotzebueAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kotzebue Lions Club v. City of KotzebueAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Navistar International Transportation Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API