Dilley v. Ketchikan Gateway Borough
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This appeal arises out of a sales tax dispute between the Ketchikan Gateway Borough (Borough) and Edward Dilley, a licensed pull-tab operator. Dilley was assessed over $400,000 for uncollected sales taxes, and interest, on gross revenues from pull-tab sales. The Borough Assembly denied Dilley’s appeal and upheld the assessment. The superior court affirmed. We reverse.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Dilley operates pull-tab games 1 under a state license. Typically, non-profit organizations retain Dilley to operate a pull-tab game for fund-raising purposes. See AS…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Public Employees' Local 71 v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Hillstrom v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Chilivis v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- Navistar International Transportation Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Kotzebue Lions Club v. City of KotzebueAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Kotzebue Lions Club v. City of KotzebueAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Navistar International Transportation Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994