Legal Opinion

Navistar International Transportation Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

California Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1994No. S032195Published

1Opinion of the Court

8 Cal.4th 868 (1994)

884 P.2d 108

35 Cal. Rptr.2d 651

NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. S032195.

Supreme Court of California.

November 28, 1994.

COUNSEL

Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, C. Douglas Floyd, Jeffrey M. Vesely and Craig A. Becker for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Elizabeth C. Burton and Kendall L. Houghton as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, and Richard F. Finn, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

KENNA…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Culligan Water Conditioning of Bellflower, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Roth Drug, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Wallace Berrie & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Simplicity Pattern Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API