Legal Opinion

United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided November 9, 1915No. 4489PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the United States against the United Shoe_ Machinery Company and others. On application for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

DYER, District Judge.

The plaintiff filed its bill of complaint against the defendants, and therein prays, among other things, that a preliminary injunction he granted restraining the defendants and each of them from directly or indirectly enforcing, threatening, or attempting to enforce certain clauses of the leases particularly referred to *508in the bill. Upon the hearing of this application the court was favored by long and able arguments, to- which it listened with attention and interest. The court was further favored by written arguments and briefs, to which it has also given consideration. -

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Truly v. WanzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  2. Elliott Mach. Co. v. CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Ingersoll-Rand CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1916
  3. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1920
  4. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. JarrettDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1942
  5. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API