Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Sawyer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 28, 2002No. 01-35103PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge.
Miguel Lawayne Taylor appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. Taylor’s petition sought an order directing the Federal Bureau of Prisons to designate an Oregon Department of Corrections facility for service of his federal sentence nunc pro tunc1 to May 10, 1993, thereby giving effect to an allegedly concurrent state sentence. Taylor contends that the Bureau of Prisons’ denial of the request for designation was based on an invalid policy statement that he argues is contrary to the governing statutory law. He contends…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Michael Aaron LittleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Jonah R. v. Gilbert CarmonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Taylor v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Fegans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Santiago v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.