Legal Opinion

Dimoff v. Maitre

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 27, 1983No. 81-781PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a medical malpractice case. The plaintiff, Helen Dimoff, alleged in her complaint that the defendant, Dr. Michael Maitre, negligently performed certain dental work for her. The trial court granted summary judgment for Dr. Maitre.

On or about March 2, 1977, Dr. Maitre undertook to provide Mrs. Dimoff with permanent bridgework and crowns for several teeth in her lower and upper jaws. According to Mrs. Dimoff, Dr. Maitre tried and failed several times to prepare proper impressions of Mrs. Dimoff's bite and teeth and to provide adequate temporary crowns. Fourteen months after Dr. Maitre…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parrish v. SpinkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Lloyd Noland Foundation, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Tant v. Women's ClinicSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Allen v. Mobile InfirmarySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Underwood v. Holy Name of Jesus HospitalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Bell v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Tuscaloosa Orthopedic Appliance Co. v. WyattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Anderson v. Alabama Reference LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Sorrell v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API