Tant v. Women's Clinic
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
These consolidated medical malpractice suits (including the husband's derivative action for medical expenses and loss of services), claiming damages for negligence and lack of informed consent in the performance of a vaginal hysterectomy, present two dispositive issues:
1. Whether the trial Court erred in directing a verdict for the Defendant on the negligence claim where the urologist who performed the corrective surgery testified as follows:
"Q In a vaginal hysterectomy would it be anticipated that the ureter would be sutured in an operation?
"A No, Sir.
". . .
"Doctor, is it in keeping with the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Thomas v. BerriosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. BradshawDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1974
- Blount v. BlountSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Parkinson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Baker v. ChastainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Wheeldon v. MadisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Bell v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Powell v. MullinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Hines v. ArmbresterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.