Legal Opinion
Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 8, 1983No. 81 Civ. 1107 (CBM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MOTLEY, Chief Judge.
Nature of the Action
This is an action, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 et seq., for patent infringement. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). Plaintiff is the owner of United States Letters Patent No. 3,760,424, and seeks, inter alia, an injunction and damages for the alleged infringement of his patent. The court has previously tried the issue of the validity of the pate.nt and, by Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed May 11, 1982, 556 F.Supp. 273, found plaintiff’s patent to be valid.
Background
P…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Maclaren v. B-I-W Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Lemelson v. Carolina Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Upjohn Company v. Italian Drugs Importing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- David Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- David Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984