Matylinsky v. Budge
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether trial counsel was ineffective in a 1984 Nevada murder case. 1 Frank Matylinsky (“Matylinsky”) alleges that his attorney provided ineffective assistance under the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). We disagree, and we affirm the district court’s denial of habeas relief.
I
After spending an evening drinking and ingesting illicit substances, Matylinsky returned home to his pregnant wife, Margaret (“Peggy”) Matylinsky. Domestic violence ensued. Though Matylinsky claims he does not recall…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Palmer v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Phillip Hartsfield v. Stephanie DorethyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Treesh v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- John Lesko v. Secretary Pennsylvania DepartmCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Towery v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.