Legal Opinion

Lucking v. Ballantyne

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1903No. Docket No. 104PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J. Petition by Thomas M. Lucking, receiver of taxes for the city of Detroit, against John Ballantyne, receiver of W. J. Gould & Company, to compel the payment óf certain taxes. From a decree for petitioner, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Defendant Ballantyne, the receiver in the above-entitled cause, asks this court to set aside a decree rendered by the court below, compelling him to pay the petitioner, the receiver of taxes of Detroit, $1,714.14 for city taxes assessed against the defendant corporation, W. J. Gould & Co., as the owner of the receivership property. The facts are as follows: On February 28, 1902, W. J. Gould & Co. executed and delivered to said Ballantyne, as trustee, a mortgage upon its stock of goods and other personal property, situated in the city of Detroit, *585to secure the payment of the aggregate amount…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eaton v. ChesebroughMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Ever Krisp Food Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Detroit Trust Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bear River Paper & Bag Co. v. City of PetoskeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  4. United States v. State of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1972
  5. Michigan National Bank v. City of Auburn HillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API