Legal Opinion
Palm Springs Turf Club v. California Horse Racing Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1957No. Civ. 5516PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, William V. O’Connor, Chief Deputy Attorney General, and Howard S. Goldin, Deputy Attorney General, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, J. pro tem. *
Respondent filed an application with appellant California Horse Racing Board for a license to conduct thoroughbred horse racing at Palm Springs, Riverside County, California. The application was filed pursuant to section 19480.5 of division 8, article 4 of the Business and Professions Code, generally referred to as the California Horse Racing Act. Section 19480.5 provides that:
“The board shall not issue a license to conduct a horse racing meeting at any place, inclosure, or track, not used for horse racing meetings prior to July 1,1941, unless prior to the beginning of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Swars v. Council of City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Marcucci v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Weiss v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Rudolph v. Athletic CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. Environmental Quality CouncilWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Alta-Dena Dairy v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Emby Foods, Inc. v. PaulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.