In Re Detention of Dydasco
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
Kenneth Dydasco was involuntarily committed for 90 days. This commitment was less restrictive than confinement. Before expiration, the State sought to extend this commitment for an additional 180 days by filing a petition otherwise sufficient, but on only 2 days’ notice. We reverse the trial court’s dismissal of this petition, and hold that the notice given was consistent with the statute and principles of due process.
RCW 71.05.300 provides in pertinent part:
The petition for ninety day treatment shall be filed with the clerk of the superior court at least three days before expiration of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SommervilleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of Detention of GvWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Tollycraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Misterek v. Washington Mineral Products, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
- Matter of Detention of RsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of Detention of DydascoWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. DydascoWashington Supreme Court · 1998