Legal Opinion

Grant v. Hover

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1919No. 20522PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Sarpy county: James T. Begley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

Arthur M. Eemer, deceased, left a will by which he attempted to dispose of his property. He left a widow and several children. By the second and sixth paragraphs, inclusive, of his will, he gave specific property to each of his five daughters. The second paragraph is:

“I give, devise and bequeath unto my beloved daughter Bettie Hover the SW 1/4 of NE 1/4 and the SE of NW 1/4 ‘Tax Lot 6/ all in section 21, township 14, range 13, subject to the railroad right of way.”

*732And the others are similarly positive and direct in form. The seventh and eighth paragraphs of his will are as follows

“7th. It is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loosing v. LoosingNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Spencer v. ScovilNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Krause v. KrauseNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Merrill v. PardunNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hiles v. BentonNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Majerus v. SantoNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. De Witt v. SearlesNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API