Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Commercial National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 22, 1952No. 33993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

The plaintiff contends that the foreclosure and the levy and sale were void for two reasons: (1) because the foreclosure action was against “V. S. Chapman, deceased, late of said County” and that since the action was one against a dead person, it could not have been legally maintained; that the action should have been against the estate of the deceased; (2) that the estate could not be sued within the twelve months following her appointment as administratrix, and the plaintiff claims that for these reasons the court erred in finding for the bank. The contentions are without merit. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baggett v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Merchants & Mechanics Bank v. BeardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Gurr v. GurrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Roland v. Coleman & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  5. Lewis v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Manchester Motors, Inc. v. FARMERS &C. BANK OF MANCHESTERCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Vitiaz v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Cunningham v. Estate of CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Hardin v. KNOX CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Trust Co. Bank v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API