Legal Opinion
Vitiaz v. Chrysler Credit Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 2, 1975No. 50835PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Presiding Judge.
1. There was no error in granting the defendant additional time in which to file responsive pleadings to the complaint, without the consent of complainant. See Section 6 (b) of the Civil Practice Act (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 617; Code Ann. § 81A-106 (b)).
2. The fact that the complaint for damages was sworn to and the answer was not sworn to was not ground for dismissing the answer, there being no requirement for sworn pleadings in such cases.
3. (a) Where the holder of a security interest on an automobile securing the purchase price thereof was notified by the debtor…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Scales v. PeevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Crutcher v. Crawford Land Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Street v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- General Gas Corporation v. CarnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Alexander v. Boston Old Colony InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guthrie v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Heimanson v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Luedtke v. National Stor-All, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Heimanson v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Lawson v. Duke Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.