Legal Opinion
Bundick v. Bay City Independent School District
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 28, 2001No. CIV. G-98-245PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Kent, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the United States Magistrate Judge which recommends that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants be GRANTED and that all claims asserted by Plaintiff, David Eugene Bun-dick, be DISMISSED; no objections have been filed by any party.
Upon de novo review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is a well reasoned and correct application of law to the facts in this case. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nieshe v. Concrete School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- J.P. v. Millard Public SchoolsNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- Khan v. Fort Bend Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Tarkington Independent School District v. Ellis, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2006
- Nieshe v. Concrete School Dist.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.