Cohen v. La Canada Land & Water Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. D. K. Trash, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an action to have it adjudged that plaintiff is entitled to the use of certain water, to recover damages for alleged diversion thereof, and to enjoin defendants from diverting the same; and the main issue in the case is whether or not the defendants had the right to destroy or materially diminish the flow of water from certain flowing springs belonging to plaintiff by means of tunnels dug by defendants near and under said springs. The judgment of the court below, although nominally in favor of plaintiff as to some matters, was substantially in favor of defendants on the said main…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- McClintock v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by21 opinions
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co. v. VerdugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Miller v. Bay Cities Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Hudson v. DaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Horne v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.