Legal Opinion
Wachter v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 23, 1988No. Civ. S-87-2118PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SMALKIN, District Judge.
I
This case is now before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, or, in the alternative, to dismiss the complaint. The plaintiffs have opposed the motion in a fashion fully consistent with Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(e), including the submission of the affidavit of plaintiffs’ medical expert. Therefore, the Court will treat the matter as a motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs have filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment. No oral hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 6, D.Md.
Plaintiffs Jean Wachter and her husband commenced this case…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Fred David Wilson, Administrator of the Estate of Michael Glenn Wilson, Deceased v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Christian Lewis v. Sheila D. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Cochran v. Wyeth, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Gay v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
- Nash v. RaneriCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.